Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 21:32:41 GMT -6
Spain in March of this same year to reform this law due to its repressive potential", just as receives serious criticism in the latest report from the European Commission on the validity of the rule of law. We can report up to truths and lies about the proposals registered by PSOE and UP in Parliament to repeal the gag law. It is true that the regime of infractions and sanctions for breaches of the citizen security law is being reviewed. But it is a lie that “facilities are given to criminals,” among other reasons because crimes and their penalties are not regulated in the citizen security law, but in the Penal Code. It is true that the peaceful exercise of the right to assembly or demonstration will not be punishable, even without prior communication, when it is a spontaneous expression in the face of an event of undoubted social repercussion that does not allow for delay (Let us remember the concentrations following the ruling on “the herd. But it is a lie that the legal requirement to communicate in advance the holding of demonstrations is generally eliminated.
That those who communicate a demonstration with an object or purpose different from that actually intended will be responsible for infringement (Remember the fascist demonstration in Chueca called supposedly in support of the 2030 Agenda). But it is a lie that the obligation Australia Phone Number to require “authorization” to demonstrate is now eliminated, for the simple reason that in democracy the right to demonstrate does not require “authorization.” It is true that the mere taking of images or their dissemination in places of public transit and demonstrations will not constitute an infraction, except when it generates certain danger for the personal or family safety of the agents. Therefore, it is a lie that the police and civil guards are unprotected in this regard. Yes, we are going to repeal the gag law It is true that the authorities must develop specific protocols on the use of force and riot control equipment, in order to always use the least harmful means and avoiding those that cause irreparable injuries. But it is a lie that any specific material is prohibited by law.
True that the maximum time for identifying people in police stations is set at two hours, which can be extended to six hours for exceptional and justified reasons. Therefore, it is a lie that the limit is necessarily set at two hours. It is true that people identified in police stations will have the right to have their return facilitated to the place where the initial identification could not be carried out, but only if it is a different municipality and the service is not altered. So it is a lie that agents have to act as “taxi drivers.” It is true that it is regulated that in external body searches (street searches) the entire body is not left visible, nor each of its parts successively, with the utmost respect for sexual identity, always trying to do it in place reserved and out of sight of third parties. But it is a lie that searches on public roads are prohibited. It is true that the presumption of truthfulness of the testimony of the agents in the infringement reports requires coherence, logic and reasonableness, and always unless proven otherwise.
That those who communicate a demonstration with an object or purpose different from that actually intended will be responsible for infringement (Remember the fascist demonstration in Chueca called supposedly in support of the 2030 Agenda). But it is a lie that the obligation Australia Phone Number to require “authorization” to demonstrate is now eliminated, for the simple reason that in democracy the right to demonstrate does not require “authorization.” It is true that the mere taking of images or their dissemination in places of public transit and demonstrations will not constitute an infraction, except when it generates certain danger for the personal or family safety of the agents. Therefore, it is a lie that the police and civil guards are unprotected in this regard. Yes, we are going to repeal the gag law It is true that the authorities must develop specific protocols on the use of force and riot control equipment, in order to always use the least harmful means and avoiding those that cause irreparable injuries. But it is a lie that any specific material is prohibited by law.
True that the maximum time for identifying people in police stations is set at two hours, which can be extended to six hours for exceptional and justified reasons. Therefore, it is a lie that the limit is necessarily set at two hours. It is true that people identified in police stations will have the right to have their return facilitated to the place where the initial identification could not be carried out, but only if it is a different municipality and the service is not altered. So it is a lie that agents have to act as “taxi drivers.” It is true that it is regulated that in external body searches (street searches) the entire body is not left visible, nor each of its parts successively, with the utmost respect for sexual identity, always trying to do it in place reserved and out of sight of third parties. But it is a lie that searches on public roads are prohibited. It is true that the presumption of truthfulness of the testimony of the agents in the infringement reports requires coherence, logic and reasonableness, and always unless proven otherwise.