Post by anik4200 on Feb 18, 2024 5:49:33 GMT -6
Debt, in turn, violates the system of court orders, and the 48-hour deadline for compliance with the determinations is incompatible with the time required for their implementation. With information from the STF press office.The Socialism and Freedom Party (PSOL), the Communist Party of Brazil (PCdoB) and Solidariedade filed a lawsuit with the Federal Supreme Court asking for all payments under leniency agreements signed before August 2020, when the "lava jet" ended. " used the agreements to blackmail defendants. Reproduction/Twitter Former prosecutor Deltan Dallagnol commanded the 'lava jet' in Curitiba Reproduction/Twitter In the action, the parties argue that the suspension of payments does not need to result in the annulment of the agreements and should only affect the pecuniary commitments assumed by the companies.
The parties claim that the lavajatista agreements were signed before the technical cooperation agreement signed by the STF, Comptroller General of the Union, Attorney General of the Union, Court of Auditors of the Union and the Ministry of Justice. "The MPF, unconstitutionally, called upon itself all leniency agreements, arrogating to itself exclusive competence to conclude all these leniency agreements, which caused serious distortions in the pecuniary part of the agreements, which did not observe, even rem Special Phone Number Data otely, the criteria revealed by ACT", argue the captions. Finally, the associations maintain that the agreements signed by the Curitiba consortium were based on "coercion" and the use of prolonged preventive arrests of businesspeople. "Under such conditions, there is no voluntariness when the currency of exchange is the freedom of the person and the bankruptcy of the company."Ministers Dias Toffoli and Luiz Fux, from the Federal Supreme Court, highlighted the importance of the public hearing held this Tuesday and Wednesday (27 and 28/3) to debate the rules of the Marco Civil da Internet.
Ministers, public hearing was 'extremely important' and 'exemplary' STF At the end of the debates on Wednesday morning, the last day of the meeting, Toffoli said that the meeting was "extremely important and relevant" to bring to court the various views of civil society, legal operators and the parties to the process. Minister Fux classified the public hearing as "exemplary due to the level of excellence of the exhibitions". The ministers are the rapporteurs of two extraordinary resources that discuss the responsibility of application providers or internet tools for content generated by users and the possibility of removing content that may offend personality rights, incite hatred or spread fake news from extrajudicial notification.
The parties claim that the lavajatista agreements were signed before the technical cooperation agreement signed by the STF, Comptroller General of the Union, Attorney General of the Union, Court of Auditors of the Union and the Ministry of Justice. "The MPF, unconstitutionally, called upon itself all leniency agreements, arrogating to itself exclusive competence to conclude all these leniency agreements, which caused serious distortions in the pecuniary part of the agreements, which did not observe, even rem Special Phone Number Data otely, the criteria revealed by ACT", argue the captions. Finally, the associations maintain that the agreements signed by the Curitiba consortium were based on "coercion" and the use of prolonged preventive arrests of businesspeople. "Under such conditions, there is no voluntariness when the currency of exchange is the freedom of the person and the bankruptcy of the company."Ministers Dias Toffoli and Luiz Fux, from the Federal Supreme Court, highlighted the importance of the public hearing held this Tuesday and Wednesday (27 and 28/3) to debate the rules of the Marco Civil da Internet.
Ministers, public hearing was 'extremely important' and 'exemplary' STF At the end of the debates on Wednesday morning, the last day of the meeting, Toffoli said that the meeting was "extremely important and relevant" to bring to court the various views of civil society, legal operators and the parties to the process. Minister Fux classified the public hearing as "exemplary due to the level of excellence of the exhibitions". The ministers are the rapporteurs of two extraordinary resources that discuss the responsibility of application providers or internet tools for content generated by users and the possibility of removing content that may offend personality rights, incite hatred or spread fake news from extrajudicial notification.